An Adaptive Threshold Tracking Area Update and Selective Probabilistic Paging Scheme for Signaling Cost Reduction in 5G NR Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2026.3.2701Keywords:
5G NR, mobility management, paging, signaling cost, tracking area updateAbstract
Tracking area update (TAU) and paging are two competing signaling-cost characteristics of 5G NR networks: a smaller registration area reduces paging cost but increases TAU signaling and vice versa. The majority of existing schemes optimize one parameter while fixing the other and apply a single network-wide parameterization to all users regardless of their heterogeneous call and mobility patterns. This paper proposes ATAU-SP, a scheme that manages both operations jointly, on a per user equipment (UE) basis: each UE maintains an online estimate of its call-to-mobility ratio (CMR) and triggers a TAU only after an adaptive movement threshold derived by minimizing a per UE cost function, with a dwell-time guard that suppresses boundary ping-pong updates. The network builds a residence-probability distribution from a learned Markov mobility model and pages cells in descending probability rounds up to a delay bound. We derive a closed-form analytical cost model and validate it as a provable upper bound against a custom discrete-event simulator. The results show that a well-tuned TAL scheme is the lowest-cost baseline over most of the moderate CMRs, ATAU-SP-ML attains the lowest cost at high CMR, and plain ATAU-SP is best only at very low CMR. Nonetheless, ATAU-SP variants dominate the classical static, distance-, movement-, and time-based schemes throughout, and both ATAU-SP and TAL require materially less machinery per UE state and network side than a full TAL list distribution subsystem.
Downloads
References
[1] S.M.A. Zaidi, M. Manalastas, H. Farooq, and A. Imran, "Mobility Management in Emerging Ultra-dense Cellular Networks: A Survey, Outlook, and Future Research Directions", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 183505-183533, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027258
View in Google Scholar
[2] A. Sufyan et al., "From 5G to Beyond 5G: A Comprehensive Survey of Wireless Network Evolution, Challenges, and Promising Technologies", Electronics, vol. 12, art. no. 2200, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12102200
View in Google Scholar
[3] Y. Ullah et al., "A Survey on Handover and Mobility Management in 5G HetNets: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions", Sensors, vol. 23, art. no. 5081, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115081
View in Google Scholar
[4] A. Bar-Noy, I. Kessler, and M. Sidi, "Mobile Users: To Update or Not to Update?", Wireless Networks, vol. 1, pp. 175-185, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202540
View in Google Scholar
[5] A.G. Chekol and M.S. Fufa, "A Survey on Next Location Prediction Techniques, Applications, and Challenges", EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2022, art. no. 29, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-022-02114-6
View in Google Scholar
[6] H. Jang and J. Baek, "Optimal TAL-based Registration with Cell-based Central Policy in Mobile Cellular Networks: A Semi-Markov Process Approach", The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, pp. 9172-9189, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03624-8
View in Google Scholar
[7] M. Bagaa, T. Taleb, and A. Ksentini, "Efficient Tracking Area Management Framework for 5G Networks", IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, pp. 4117-4131, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2016.2535217
View in Google Scholar
[8] W.-K. Choi and J.-Y. Pyun, "Machine Learning-based Paging Enhancement in 5G Network", Applied Sciences, vol. 12, art. no. 9555, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199555
View in Google Scholar
[9] C. Rose and R. Yates, "Minimizing the Average Cost of Paging Under Delay Constraints", Wireless Networks, vol. 1, pp. 211-219, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202543
View in Google Scholar
[10] M. Yan et al., "Mobility Prediction Using a Weighted Markov Model Based on Mobile User Classification", Sensors, vol. 21, art. no. 1740, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051740
View in Google Scholar
[11] I.F. Akyildiz, J.S.M. Ho, and Y.-B. Lin, "Movement-based Location Update and Selective Paging for PCS Networks", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 4, pp. 629-638, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/90.532871
View in Google Scholar
[12] S.K. Thillaigovindhan et al., "A Comprehensive Survey on Machine Learning Methods for Handover Optimization in 5G Networks", Electronics, vol. 13, art. no. 3223, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163223
View in Google Scholar
[13] M. S. Mollel et al., "A Survey of Machine Learning Applications to Handover Management in 5G and Beyond", IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 45770-45802, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067503
View in Google Scholar
[14] B. Sapkota et al., "5G Network Deployment Planning Using Metaheuristic Approaches", Telecom, vol. 5, pp. 588-608, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom5030030
View in Google Scholar
[15] B.B. Haile, E. Mutafungwa, and J. Hämäläinen, "A Data-driven Multiobjective Optimization Framework for Hyperdense 5G Network Planning", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 169423-169443, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023452
View in Google Scholar
[16] M. Al-Khalidi, R. Al-Zaidi, and M. Hammoudeh, "Network Mobility Management Challenges, Directions, and Solutions: An Architectural Perspective", Electronics, vol. 11, art. no. 2696, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11172696
View in Google Scholar
[17] H. Riaz, S. Öztürk, and A. Çalhan, "A Robust Handover Optimization Based on Velocity-aware Fuzzy Logic in 5G Ultra-dense Small Cell HetNets", Electronics, vol. 13, art. no. 3349, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173349
View in Google Scholar
[18] J. Navarro-Ortiz et al., "A Survey on 5G Usage Scenarios and Traffic Models", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, pp. 905-929, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.2971781
View in Google Scholar
[19] A. Haghrah, M.P. Abdollahi, H. Azarhava, and J.M. Niya, "A Survey on the Handover Management in 5G-NR Cellular Networks: Aspects, Approaches and Challenges", EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2023, art. no. 52, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-023-02261-4
View in Google Scholar
[20] I.F. Akyildiz et al., "Mobility Management in Next-generation Wireless Systems", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, pp. 1347-1384, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.775420
View in Google Scholar
[21] A.A.R. Alsaeedy and E.K.P. Chong, "Tracking Area Update and Paging in 5G Networks: A Survey of Problems and Solutions", Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 24, pp. 578-595, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1160-6
View in Google Scholar
[22] M.C. González, C.A. Hidalgo, and A.-L. Barabási, "Understanding Individual Human Mobility Patterns", Nature, vol. 453, pp. 779-782, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06958
View in Google Scholar
[23] T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies, "A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, pp. 483-502, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.72
View in Google Scholar
[24] C. Song, Z. Qu, N. Blumm, and A.-L. Barabási, "Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility", Science, vol. 327, pp. 1018-1021, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177170
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kalpesh Popat, Divyakant Meva, Hardik Molia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.