PFS scheme for forcing better service in best effort IP network

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2004.2.244

Keywords:

IP-based network, better than best effort service, priority forcing scheme

Abstract

The paper presents recent results corresponding to a new strategy for source traffic generating, named priority forcing scheme (PFS), allowing Internet users for getting better than best effort service in IP network. The concept of PFS assumes that an application, called PFS application, sends to the network a volume of additional traffic for the purpose of making the reservations for the data traffic in the overloaded router queues along the packet path in the IP network. The emitted redundant packets, named R-packets, should be rather of small size comparing to the data packets, named D-packets. The PFS scheme assumes that the R-packets waiting in a queue can be replaced by the arriving D-packets and belonging to the same flow. In this way, the D-packets can experience a prioritised service comparing to the packets produced by a non-PFS application. Notice that the proposed solution does not require any quality of service (QoS) mechanisms implemented in the network, like scheduler, dropping, marking etc., except R- and D-packets identification and replacing. We discuss the PFS efficiency for forcing priority in the overloaded conditions. Moreover simple system analysis is also presented. Finally, the profits of using PFS scheme are illustrated by examples corresponding to FTP (TCP controlled traffic) and VoIP (UDP streaming traffic) applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Bąk, W. Burakowski, F. Ricciato, S. Salsano, and H. Tarasiuk, "Traffic handling in AQUILA QoS IP network", in Proc. Quality of Future Internet Services, QoFIS 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2001, vol. 2156.
View in Google Scholar

[2] A. Bąk et al., "AQUILA network architecture: first trial experiments", J. Telecommun. Inform. Technol., no. 2, 2002, pp. 3-13.
View in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Bernet et al., "Differentiated services", Internet Draft, Feb. 1999, draft-ietf-diffserv-framework-0.2.txt
View in Google Scholar

[4] S. Blake et al., "An architecture for differentiated services", Internet RFC 2475, Dec. 1998.
View in Google Scholar

[5] R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, "Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview", RFC 1633, June 1994.
View in Google Scholar

[6] W. Burakowski and M. Fudała, "Priority forcing scheme: a new strategy for getting better than best effort service in IP-based network", in Internet Technol., Appl. Soc. Imp. Kluwer, 2002.
View in Google Scholar

[7] Broadband Network Teletraffic. Performance Evaluation and Design of Broadband Multiservice Networks. Final Report of Action COST 242, J. Roberts, U. Mocci, and J. Virtamo, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg: Springer, 1996, vol. 1155.
View in Google Scholar

[8] D. Gross and C. Harris, Fundamentals of Queuing Theory, 3 rd. ed., Series in Probability and Statistics. Boston: Wiley, 1998.
View in Google Scholar

[9] P. Hurley, J. Y. Le Boudec, P. Thiran, and M. Kara, "ABE: providing a low-delay service within best effort", IEEE Network, no. 3, pp. 60-69, 2001.
View in Google Scholar

[10] S. Keshav, An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking. Addison-Wesley, 1997, Chap. 9.
View in Google Scholar

[11] D. Wu et al., "Streaming video over the Internet: approaches and directions", IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol., March 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Submitted

2023-04-09

Published

2004-06-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLES FROM THIS ISSUE

How to Cite

[1]
M. Fudała and W. Burakowski, “PFS scheme for forcing better service in best effort IP network”, JTIT, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 23–28, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.26636/jtit.2004.2.244.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>