Technology solutions for coalition operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2004.4.268Keywords:
C4ISR, coalition, CCIS, command and control, information technology, military, defence, telecommunications, operations, SBC, session border controller, content inspection, MPLS, multi-protocol label switching, pattern matching, trusted downgrade, explicit routeAbstract
As computer technology has advanced, information processing in command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems has become highly complex. The information processed by these systems is usually of a very highly sensitive nature and is entered into specific systems that are physically isolated from each other. The physical isolation of these systems makes it cumbersome to exchange information between systems. The result is inefficient sharing of sensitive information in situations where timeliness of exchange could be a life or death reality. Since the mid 1990's, increasing efforts have been placed on improving coalition operations. Many systems have been created with the goal to improve the sharing of information and collaborative planning across coalition boundaries. The usability of these systems have had mixed levels of success and improvements will always be necessary. This paper will briefly describe three advances in telecommunications technology that could be leveraged to significantly improve coalition operations. These technologies are: the session border controller (SBC), advances in pattern matching technology, and multi-protocol label switching (MPLS).
Downloads
References
[1] D. E. Bell and L. J. Lapadula, "Secure Computer Systems: Unified Exposition and Multics Interpretation", MTR-2997, Rev. 1, MITRE Corp., Bedford Mass., March 1976.
View in Google Scholar
[2] D. Wiemer, "Wiemer-Murray domain security policy model for international interoperability", in Proc. NISSC, Arlington, USA, 1998.
View in Google Scholar
[3] Defense Information Technology Contracting Office (DITCO), "DRAFT Next Generation Collaboration Service, Statement of Objectives", published as pre-solicitation, 27 Jan. 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[4] Department of the Navy, Naval Supply Systems Command, "Multinational Information Sharing Environment", published as presolicitation notice, no. H1967, 23 Jun. 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[5] Telecommunications Magazine, "10 hottest technologies", Apr. 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[6] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publ. 800-58, "Security Considerations for Voice Over IP Systems", Apr. 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[7] J. Rosenberg et al., "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC3261, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), June 2002.
View in Google Scholar
[8] J. Pike, "FAS intelligence resource program: Radiant Mercury (RM)", Jan. 2000.
View in Google Scholar
[9] ISSE Guard Program Office, "ISSE Guard, suite of products for secure multi-domain information exchange", Nov. 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[10] D. Zellmer, "Multi-level security: reality or myth", As part of GIAC practical repository, SANS Institute, March 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[11] Integrated Device Technology, Inc., "IDT TM PAX.port TM 1200 Content Inspection Engine", 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[12] The Linley Group, "Search engine market maturing", The Linley Wire, vol. 4, issue 11, June 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[13] FortiNet, "Comprehensive solutions for real time network protection", 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[14] U. Black, "MPLS and Label Switching Networks". Prentice Hall, 2002.
View in Google Scholar
[15] E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, and R. Callon, "Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture", RFC3031, IETF, Jan. 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.